Breathwork: A Scientific Path to Reducing Stress and Enhancing Mental Health

A review of RCT-studies on Breathwork
Summarizing;

“Effect og Breathwork on Stress and mental health: A Meta-analysis of Randomised-controlled trials”

_{Disclaimer: This summary is based on the article “Effect of Breathwork on stress and mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials” by Guy William Fincham, Clara Strauss, Jesus Montero-Marin and Kate Cavanagh, and aims to provide key takeaways and a condensed overview of its content. While the essence is drawn from the original article, some parts have been simplified or rephrased to enhance understanding. Please note that we at, OptiMindInsights or any other potential writers or contributors to our summaries, do not accept responsibility for any consequences arising from the use of this summary. The information provided should not be considered a substitute for personal research or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to consult the original article for detailed insights and references. The summary does not include references, but they can typically be found within the original publication. Always exercise due diligence and consider your unique circumstances before applying any information in your personal or professional life.}
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Why you should read this summary:

Reading this summary  will give you insights on power of breathwork for managing stress, anxiety, and depression. This summary provides you with an easy a quick way of reading and understanding a first-of its-kind scientific article. The summary shows the scientifically backed benefits of integrating controlled breathing practices into your daily life, offering a practical, accessible alternative to traditional mental health interventions. Whether you're looking to deepen your understanding of breathwork or seeking effective ways to improve your mental health, this article serves as an essential guide.

Todays Breathdown:

• A review of RCT-studies on Breathwork Summarizin …

• Abstract And Introduction:

• Methods:

  • Study Selection and Search Strategy:

  • Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria:

  • Quantitative Synthesis and Meta-Analysis:

  • Subgroup Analyses and Dose-Response Relationships …

• Results:

• Discussion:

  • Analyzing Heterogeneity and Study Quality:

  • Subgroup Analysis and Dose-Response Relationships:

  • Breathwork Compared to Other Stress-Reduction Inte …

  • Mechanisms and Clinical Implications:

• Conclusion:

• Takeaways for your everyday life:

Abstract And Introduction:

Breathwork is a practise with diverse historical roots. Variations of these techniques are found in traditions including yoga, Tibetan Buddhism and many more. Recently, these methods have been popularized by people as Wim Hof, and scientific research have focussed deliberate control of breathing to promote health. Different techniques, particularly slow-paced breathing, have been linked to increased heart-rate variability (HRV), indicating a more balanced regulation of the body's stress-response system. This improvement in HRV is crucial, as dysfunctions in stress response and autonomic nervous system activity are common in conditions like stress, anxiety, and depression. By regulating breathing to approximately 5 - 6 breaths per minute, individuals may improve mental states and allow for more effective communication between various brain regions.

Try a Wim Hof breathing exercise here.

The authors state that, the relevance of this particular research has been underscored by the significant rise in stress, anxiety, and depression levels since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Traditional interventions, such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), despite their widespread endorsement, do not always lead to recovery for everyone. Breathwork, accessible and teachable to most people, presents a potential scalable intervention for mental health, offering both slow-paced practices for relaxation and fast-paced techniques for temporary stress induction that may increase resilience and mental health.

This review critically evaluates the effectiveness of breathwork interventions in reducing self-reported stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, aiming to fill a research gap highlighted by previous analyses. Those past studies that the authors refer to, often limited their focus to populations with impaired breathing capacities or did not isolate breathwork effects from other intervention components.
This present meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) specifically targets the effect of breathwork on psychological stress and examines potential heterogeneities within the data, such as participant demographics, intervention types, and delivery methods. The collective data from this investigation, reveal a small-to-medium effect size, indicating that breathwork can significantly lower stress levels compared to control conditions. Such results not only underscore breathwork's potential as a therapeutic intervention but also highlight the importance of integrating these practices into broader mental health strategies.

Methods:

Study Selection and Search Strategy:

This research exclusively focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs)—studies where participants are randomly allocated to one of two or more treatment groups to assess the effectiveness of interventions.
Extensive searches were conducted across five databases, two clinical trial registers, and grey literature up to February 2022, targeting breathwork and its impact on self-reported/subjective stress, anxiety, and depression. The search strategy was comprehensive, aiming to encompass both published and unpublished data, with a particular emphasis on the pre-registered primary outcome of stress. In addition to thise primary outcomes, secondary outcomes was defined as the additional effects measured aside from the primary goal. In this case this was; published data on anxiety and depression due to feasibility constraints.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria:

To decide what studies to include in the meta-analysis, criteria were set up. These were; Studies had to be published in English, incorporate breathwork for at least 50% of the intervention, be classified as RCTs, and involve measures of self-reported stress, anxiety, or depression in adult participants. Studies lacking the primary or secondary outcome keywords or those with control conditions involving breathwork components were excluded.

Data Extraction and Risk of Bias Assessment 

Data were extracted on self-reported stress (the primary outcome, indicating the main effect, that the study was designed to investigate), anxiety, depression, and global mental health, along with follow-up data where available.

Quantitative Synthesis and Meta-Analysis:

The authors conducted the meta-analysis using a random-effects model to evaluate the effectiveness of breathwork in reducing stress compared to control conditions. The random-effects model was chosen to account for variability across studies, acknowledging that differences in populations, interventions, and outcomes might influence the effect sizes observed.

The authors also conducted a sensitivity analysis, which tested the meta-analysis's robustness, removing one study at a time to see how each impacted the overall effect size. This step ensures that no single study disproportionately affects the meta-analysis's conclusions.

To measure the variability in outcomes across studies, the authors used Cochran's Q and Higgins' I^2 index, which are very accepted methods to do so. Cochran's Q tests the study’s heterogeneity, indicating whether differences among study results are greater than what would be expected by chance. Higgins' I^2 measures how much of the differences in a study's results come from actual variation instead of random chance, where higher numbers mean more variation.
Publication bias refers to the tendency of publishing only studies with certain outcomes, often positive ones, which can distort the overall understanding of a topic. This was examined using funnel plot analysis and Egger's test, tools designed to identify whether there's an unfair selection of studies being published.

The standardized mean difference (SMD) was the metric used for effect size, comparing the difference in outcomes between breathwork and control groups relative to the variability observed among participants. SMD offers a way to gauge the magnitude of breathwork's effect, allowing for comparison across studies with different scales or measurement units, providing a clear, concise measure of breathwork's impact on stress reduction.

Subgroup Analyses and Dose-Response Relationships 

Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the health status of participants, breathwork technique type, delivery method, and the outcome measure used.

Results:

Subscribe to The 1$ Premium Membership to read the rest.