Shifting Perceptions: How Mindset Changes Can Transform Mental Wellbeing

A look into how mindset changes our mental state Summarizing; Enhancing mental wellbeing by changing mindsets? Results from two randomized controlled trials

_{Disclaimer: This summary is based on the article “Enhancing mental wellbeing by changing mindsets? Results from two randomized controlled trials” by Carina Schreiber & Marijke Schotanus-Dijkstra and aims to provide key takeaways and a condensed overview of its content. While the essence is drawn from the original article, some parts have been simplified or rephrased to enhance understanding. Please note that we at, OptiMindInsights or any other potential writers or contributors to our summaries, do not accept responsibility for any consequences arising from the use of this summary. The information provided should not be considered a substitute for personal research or professional advice. Readers are encouraged to consult the original article for detailed insights and references. The summary does not include references, but they can typically be found within the original publication. Always exercise due diligence and consider your unique circumstances before applying any information in your personal or professional life.}
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract And Introduction

This summary synthesizes the findings from two double-blind randomized controlled trials aimed at investigating if changing individuals' beliefs about stress and life philosophy can enhance their emotional, social, and psychological well-being. The studies explored the effect of educational videos and texts designed to foster a "stress-is-enhancing" mindset and a "life-is-long-and-easy" mindset compared to control interventions.

These studies focus on the urgent need to enhance mental wellbeing today, as we face challenges like work-related stress, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, and rising mental health concerns. Improving mental health involves more than just feeling happy or content—it includes making positive social contributions and experiencing psychological growth. This kind of flourishing has been connected to improved job performance, lower healthcare costs, and reduced mortality rates.
The theoretical background of these studies draws from models like the Eudaimonic Activity Model, which suggests that well-being can be achieved through the pursuit of growth-promoting goals and consistent, intentional behavior. However, this research posits that modifying one's mindset might be a more accessible initial step, potentially facilitating behavior changes that lead to enhanced well-being with less effort. Influential theories like the Growth Mindset theory propose that individuals' beliefs significantly shape their behaviors and responses to life's challenges.

The stress mindset, defined as viewing stress either as enhancing or debilitating, has been shown in previous research to be modifiable through straightforward interventions, with shifts towards a stress-is-enhancing perspective leading to improved work performance and reduced symptoms of anxiety and depression. Conversely, the philosophy of life mindset—whether life is viewed as long and easy versus short and hard—also potentially impacts well-being, though its changeability and effects have been less studied.

Overall, the studies aim to evaluate whether simple educational interventions can effectively shift these mindsets in individuals, and thereby lead to measurable improvements in mental well-being.

Methods:

Measures:
Measurements were performed at four time points: baseline (before the intervention), immediately after watching the video (posttest), one week later, and four weeks later.
The study used several tools to measure various aspects of mental wellbeing and stress. The Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF) assessed emotional, social, and psychological wellbeing, with higher scores indicating better wellbeing.
The Stress Mindset Measure (SMM) evaluated whether individuals see stress effects as debilitating or enhancing, with higher scores reflecting a more positive view of stress's effects. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) measured the emotions people experienced in the last 24 hours, with higher scores indicating stronger emotions, whether positive or negative. The Internal Locus of Control scale from Levenson’s Multidimensional Locus of Control Scale assessed how much individuals believe their actions influence their lives, with higher scores showing a greater sense of personal control. Lastly, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) gauged the level of stress individuals felt, with higher scores indicating more perceived stress. All tools showed good reliability in measuring their respective constructs.

Results and Conclusion:

Subscribe to The 1$ Premium Membership to read the rest.